Southern India Regional Council of
The Institute of Chartered Accountants Of India
(Setup by an Act of Parliament)

 

Professional Updates

 

UPDATE ON BANKING-December 2018

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is in the process of setting up a Public Credit Registry(PCR)—an information repository that would collate all loan information of individuals and corporate borrowers.

Such a registry is expected to help banks and financial institutions to distinguish between a bad and a good borrower and accordingly the lenders would also be able to price their products better.

Earlier, RBI had set up a committee under the leadership of Mr. Y.M. Deosthalee, to examine the possibility of establishing such a registry. The committee has since submitted its report and RBI is now in the process of setting up the Registry.

Such a credit repository is expected to address the information asymmetry, improve access to credit and strengthen the credit culture among consumers. The Registry is expected to bridge information gaps which a few borrowers exploited, accessing additional credit from multiple banks without disclosing their existing debt.

Certain to help in the ease of doing business, PCR would improve India’s rankings.

The registry will be set up in a “modular and phased manner”.

While initially it would be under the wings of RBI, in due course, the central bank may consider moving the registry to a separate non-profit entity. The registry is expected to cover all credit contracts, duly verified by reporting institutions, for all lendings in India and any lending by an Indian financial institution to “an Indian natural or legal person.”

With no monetary threshold placed, the registry is expected to capture all data including external commercial borrowings, market borrowings, and all contingent liabilities so as to provide a holistic picture about the borrower’s indebtedness. Both positive and negative features of all loans and borrowers would be captured and possibly borrowers would be able to access their own history.

Addressing privacy concerns, the data will be available to stakeholders like banks and financial institutions strictly on a need-to-know basis and privacy of data will be protected. The onus of data quality would be on the reporting entities and action would be taken against the institutions in case of any violations in rules. The Registry would be backed by an appropriate legal framework.

To ensure a comprehensive database, the Registry would include data from market regulators, SEBI, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Goods and Service Tax Net Work, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) etc., to enable the banks and financial institutions to get a complete profile of the existing and prospective borrowers on real-time basis.

As of now, RBI’s CRILC is a borrower level supervisory dataset supported by 4 privately sponsored Credit Information Companies covering aggregate exposure of Rs 5 cr and above..

It was in April 2011 that Central Registry of Securitisation Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest (CERSAI) , a central online security interest registry of India, was set up. It was primarily created to check frauds in lending against equitable mortgages, in which people would take multiple loans on the same asset from different banks. This was later followed up with the setting up of a Central Fraud Registry making it a searchable database for the lenders to be wary of the unscrupulous.

With the coming in of Public Credit Registry information flow is expected to enlarge in a big way and the number of willful defaulters is expected to reduce substantially bringing down the bad loans.

----------------------P S Narasimhan(jandsca@gmail.com)



UPDATE ON BANKING-November 2018

On Stressed Assets:

The underlying theme of the revised framework on stressed assets is to provide as much flexibility as possible to the lenders and the stressed borrowers but, at the same time ensure that the resolution plan is implemented within a timeframe and that the resolution plan is credible. If lenders and the large stressed borrowers are unable to put in place a credible resolution plan within the timelines, they would be required to go through the structured insolvency resolution process under the IBC.

The revised framework also attempts to instil the requisite discipline mechanism for a one-day default in the context of bank loans, akin to the market discipline to which the borrowers raising money through debt markets are subject to. With defaults being reported to a central database, which is accessible to all banks, the credit discipline is expected to improve significantly. Nevertheless, default in payment is a lagging indicator of financial stress of a borrower and therefore, lenders need to be proactive in credit monitoring to identify financial stress at an early stage rather than wait for a borrower to default. Early identification of stress would provide sufficient time for lenders to put in place the required resolution plan.

Another major change that has been introduced is that resolution plans can now be implemented individually or jointly by lenders. Complete discretion and flexibility has been given to the banks to formulate their own ground rules in dealing with the borrowers who have exposures with multiple banks. Under the revised framework, the lenders can implement differential resolution plans that are tailored to their internal policies and risk appetite. To ensure that only credible resolution plans are implemented, a framework of independent affirmation has been introduced through the requirement of independent credit opinions on the proposed plan by empaneled credit rating agencies.

Taken as a whole, the revised framework attempts to improve the credit culture in the country and the trust between counterparties in a transaction. This will be critical in ensuring sufficient incentives for the banks to effectively carry out their role as delegated monitors of loans.

On Prompt Corrective Action:

In the case of 12 banks( of which 11 are in public sector), RBI has initiated Prompt Corrective Action , so as to restore the financial health of banks that are at risk, by limiting deterioration in their health and preserving their capital levels. Under PCA, certain restrictions are placed on these banks so as to avoid excessive risks on their balance-sheets.

Under PCA, capital, asset quality and profitability continue to be the key areas for monitoring .Common equity Tier-1 (Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted Assets) ratio has been included to constitute an additional trigger along with monitoring of leverage. .

Mandatory actions under PCA include :

a) Restriction on dividend distribution/remittance of profits;

b) Requirement on promoters/owners to bring in more capital;

c) Restrictions on branch expansion;

d) Higher provisioning requirement; and,

e) Restrictions on management compensation.

While no restriction has been imposed on the retail deposit-taking activity of any bank till date, such banks have been advised to avoid altogether the high-cost bulk deposits and instead improve their Current Account and Saving Account (CASA) deposit levels.

Merging of weak banks with stronger ones has also been considered as a method to strengthen such weak banks.

--------------------P S Narasimhan(jandsca@gmail.com)



UPDATE ON BANKING-October 2018

RBI in its Annual Report for the fiscal year 2017-18 had this to say on various audits undertaken in banks.

“ Major fraud incidents reported by banks in the recent past have highlighted the need for improvement in the audit function and its governance. In addition, an increase in divergence in asset classification and provisioning as assessed by the Reserve Bank vis-à-vis the audited financial statements of SCBs has been seen as a concern.”

Coming to Concurrent Audits ,the Regulator expects exception reports, even of a routine nature, to be seen in detail on an ongoing basis. Further RBI expects audit trail to be checked for diversion of funds through round tripping and other means. Further, the Regulator wants the auditor to ensure that FEMA guidelines are complied with and KYC / AML directions are implemented properly.

The Report noted the quality of audit to suffer due to inadequate human resources, lack of desired skill-sets (particularly for specialised branches), non-adherence to stipulated timelines for compliance with audit findings, non-inclusion of some critical areas, etc., indicating inadequate attention to sustainable compliance with the findings of earlier reports. The Report bemoans instances of repetitive and similar audit findings over the years without the causative factors ever being eliminated.. Further ,the report noted that internal audit could not detect many frauds, which came to light after accounts turned NPA and wanted fraud detection and reporting, as well as preventive steps, to be more risk-focused so as to identify red flags at an incipient stage.

The Report flagged non-adherence to Income Recognition and Asset Classification (IRAC) norms by banks to be a major concern. In this respect, the audit function- the report lamented – is yet to provide desired level of assurance to all stakeholders, including the Reserve Bank. While it concedes that there may be instances of information asymmetry between the supervisor and other stakeholders, the report points out that NPA divergence should not arise from lack of adherence to regulatory guidelines.

RBI wants the Statutory auditors to undertake root cause analysis to identify deficiencies exposed by incidents of fraud, and divergences in asset classification and provisioning. The Report points out that Statutory auditors could identify issues faced by banks in implementing system-based identification of NPAs as well as utilise more effectively the central database in banks for their assignments. It also notes that the need for improvement in the inputs provided by statutory auditors through Long Form Audit Report as they provide useful inputs for risk based supervision of banks.

To enhance audit quality and to introduce a transparent mechanism to examine the accountability of SAs in a consistent manner, the report says that the regulator has decided to put in place a graded enforcement action framework to enable appropriate action on SAs for any lapses observed in conducting a bank’s statutory audit which would cover, inter alia, instances of divergence identified in asset classification and provisioning during the Reserve Bank’s inspection vis-à-vis the audited financial statements of banks above the threshold specified by the Reserve Bank in the circular issued on April 18, 2017 ---------P S Narasimhan-jandsca@gmail.com



UPDATE ON BANKING-September 2018

The recently met, the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of RBI decided to increase the repo rate under the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) by 25 basis points to 6.5 per cent and consequently, the reverse repo rate under the LAF stands adjusted to 6.25 per cent, and the marginal standing facility (MSF) rate and the Bank Rate to 6.75 per cent.

The decision of the MPC was consistent with its objective of achieving the medium-term target for consumer price index (CPI) inflation of 4 per cent within a band of +/- 2 per cent, while supporting growth. The decision was based on the following assessment. While the US economy rebounded strongly in Q 2, Euro area reported sluggish growth and major emerging market economies had slowed down considerably. The Chinese economy was grappling with efforts to contain debt which slowed down the pace of growth and except perhaps Russia, other countries had to deal with a host of issues like weak exports, high employment, muted industrial production, uncertainty on the Brexit issues and crude oil prices etc., Trade wars have not helped either..

. On the domestic front, south-west monsoon has been quite active and many of the reservoirs have got filled up which portends well for agriculture though flooding, inundation and rains without a break have caused large scale destruction and have impacted large tracts of cultivable lands

. Industrial growth, strengthened in April-May 2018 and was driven mainly by a significant turnaround in the production of capital goods and consumer durables. Growth in the infrastructure/construction sector accelerated sharply, , while the growth of consumer non-durables decelerated significantly. The output of eight core industries accelerated in June and capacity utilisation in the manufacturing sector remained robust.

An uptick in fuel and in items other than food impacted retail inflation..RBI’s survey of households indicate further uptick in inflation both in the near term and one-year ahead horizon. While export growth picked up, double-digit import growth pushed up the trade deficit. As to the coming days, several factors -the. MSP announced for kharif crops, monsoon, crude oil prices, reduction in GST over a wide range of products, are likely to influence the retail inflation..

However, while the robust corporate earnings indicate that economic activity has continued to be strong,, rising trade protectionism poses a grave risk to near-term and long-term global growth. The banking sector which is trying to shed the massive baggage of stressed assets is looking for an accelerated growth in the economy to help it perform better.



…..P S Narasimhan-jandsca@gmail.com


UPDATE ON BANKING - August 2018

 

------P S Narasimhan (jandsca@gmail.com)

Reserve Bank of India has come out recently with an Enforcement Action Framework targeting Statutory Auditors for lapses in the Statutory Audit of banks. It is formulated so as to evolve a transparent mechanism by which the accountability of Statutory Auditors would be examined in a consistent manner with an idea to improve audit quality.

The type of lapses that would be taken up for scrutiny under this framework would include misstatements in financial statements, wrong certifications, wrong information the Long Form Audit Report, lapses in adhering to RBI ‘s directions/guidelines and misconduct of the auditors when carrying out the audit assignments.

Fact of the lapse will be determined based on non-adherence to Statutory provisions/directives, variance between those reported and those determined by RBI after its annual inspection. . The next stage would be to determine the materiality of the lapse which will be based on the extent. frequency and impact of the violation/lapse. Repeated and persisting violations would also be taken in to account

RBI would provide a reasonable opportunity to the auditors to present their view points and enforcement action if taken would be communicated by way of a speaking order.

Statutory Auditors would be cautioned on lapses considered not material , through a cautionary advice. On the other hand, if the violations are considered material, enforcement action would be by way of not approving their appointments for undertaking statutory audits in commercial banks for a specified period. In the case of those auditors who have been debarred by other regulatory , government or law-enforcement agencies, RBI will not approve their appointments. In such of the pending cases, where public interest is involved and the case is of serious nature where the culpability of the firm is established, RBI would debar such audit firms.

All enforcement actions including issuance of cautionary notice will be placed in the public domain apart from being communicated to the Institute of Chartered accountants of India.

Regulator released the Financial Stability Report in June 2018.Some of the observations in the Financial Stability Report of the Regulator are given below.

The stress in the banking sector is likely to grow as gross non-performing advances (GNPA) ratio in the banking sector rises further.

In 2017-18, the Profitability of SCBs declined, partly due to increased provisioning. The impact on profitability has added pressure on SCBs’ regulatory capital ratios, while the provision coverage ratio has increased.

Interestingly ,Credit growth of SCBs picked up during 2017-18 notwithstanding sluggish deposit growth.

Macro-stress tests conducted indicate that the overall GNPA ratio may rise from 11.6 per cent in March 2018 to 12.2 per cent by March 2019 and the system-level capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CRAR) may come down from 13.5 per cent to 12.8 per cent during the period. Banks under the prompt corrective action framework are likely to experience a worsening of their GNPA ratio from 21.0 per cent in March 2018 to 22.3 per cent, and six of them may end up experiencing capital shortfall relative to the required minimum CRAR of 9 per cent.


UPDATE ON BANKING - July 2018

 

------P S Narasimhan (jandsca@gmail.com)

The month of June saw a significant move by the Allahabad High Court towards the dues of the Power Sector to the Banks. The outstandings to banks from the Power Sector account for Rs 5.18 lakh crores as of April,2018. Of this Rs 70000 cr have turned out NPAs of which Rs 34600 cr is before the NCLTs.

Echoing the sentiments of the Parliamentary panel which had recognized that stress in the power sector is often caused by several factors including fuel shortage, sub-optimal loading, untied capacities, absence of fuel supply agreements and lack of power purchase agreements , which are beyond the control of these companies, the Court felt that to ask the banks to apply the RBI guidelines mechanically , would only push these plants further into trouble without any hope of recovery. The Power Ministry was not happy about the RBI’s mandate on arriving at a quick fix Resolution Plan and wanted atleast a year’s time in resolving the issues involved. The Court has asked the Finance Ministry to call for a meeting between all the stake holders by June end so as to arrive at a consensus.

The Finance Secretary is to hold the meeting with his counterparts in the power, petroleum and coal ministries as well as the representatives of the RBI and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India.

Units in the MSME sector had some respite from the prudential norms last fiscal. Now the Ministry has come out with an extended relaxation for these units in meeting their dues to the banking sector.

Past due criterion for these units will be fixed at 180 days , including those not registered under GST, and the asset classified as a ‘standard’ asset, subject to the certain conditions:

  1. i) The total exposure, including non-fund based facilities to the borrower should not exceed Rs 25 cr as on May 31, 2018.

  2. ii) It should have been categorized as a standard asset as on August 31, 2017.

  3. iii) The payments due as on September 1, 2017 and falling due thereafter up to December 31, 2018 should have got paid not later than 180 days from their original due date.

  4. iv) While the units registered under GST will have to conform to the 90 day norm in a phased manner as prescribed, those not under GST will have to revert to the 90 day norm immediately after December 31, 2018.

  5. v) The benefit is for asset classification only and the income will have to be serviced to get the benefit of recognition.

With a view to enhance credit discipline among large borrowers, the Reserve Bank of India proposes to have a loan system for delivery of bank credit which stipulate a minimum level of 'loan component' in fund based working capital finance and a mandatory Credit Conversion Factor (CCF) for the undrawn portion of cash credit/ overdraft limits availed. Cash Credit, the most popular mode of working capital financing, poses several regulatory challenges such as perpetual roll overs, transmission of liquidity management from the borrowers to banks/RBI, hampering smooth transmission of monetary policy. The proposed system is expected to answer them.

In the wake of increasing yields, RBI has decided to grant banks the option to spread provisioning for their mark to market (MTM) losses on all investments held in AFS and HFT for the quarter ending June 30, 2018 as well. The provisioning required may be spread equally over up to four quarters, commencing with the quarter ending June 30, 2018.


UPDATE ON BANKING AND INSURANCE – June 2018

 

------P S Narasimhan (jandsca@gmail.com)

The Regulator’s circular dated 12 Feb 2018 on restructuring had created a substantial buzz in banking circles. Deputy Governor of Reserve bank of India recently came out with a detailed explanation on the logic behind RBI’s decision.

Asset classification was to be based on the record of recovery in the books of the individual banks. When the banks reported the asset classification of the borrowers under CRILC, it made the regulator sit up. It noticed huge divergence between banks and this caused the RBI to attempt a AQR in 2015-16. The exercise did pile up the NPAs substantially.

While the CDR worked well initially, the regulator felt that in the later years, banks started using the scheme to postpone identifying non-performance.

RBI later introduced Strategic Debt Restructuring, flexible structuring of project loans and a scheme for Sustainable Structuring of stressed assets(S4A) to enable the banks to attempt adeep structure by way change in management, substantial hair cuts etc.,. so as to revive the industrial units.

It was noticed that in most of the SDR cases, change in management was never examined and the number of cases under S 4A were far and few to warrant a separate scheme.

With the coming in of IBC code, the regulator thought it proper to resolve borrower defaults through the collective decision making of the creditors.

It was therefore thought fit to aim at a seamless framework where out of court workouts are first attempted and where they fail, a statutory process under IBC would kick in.

Thus now within a specified time frame, flexibility is provided both to the lenders and the borrowers to arrive at a workable resolution.

More has been talked about on the resolution plans on one day overdues. In the bond market the same borrowers are seen to adhere strictly to the timelines for even a day’s delay they experience a market backlash by way of fall in ratings, escalation in finance costs, yields on bonds shoot up, legal action gets initiated and the impact is substantial. Debt contracts with banks do not receive the same respect. The sanctity of debt covenants are broken with impunity.It is deter the borrowers from adopting such an approach that the regulator has asked the banks to be ready with a resolution plan even for a day’s delay. While cash credits continue to have thirty day trigger , the one day default clause is to bring in the much needed financial discipline amongst the borrowers.

Another major change contemplated is that such a resolution plan can be implemented individually or jointly by the lenders. Earlier the decision of the Joint Lender’s Forum was binding on all the members and the small players felt marginalized ; now, they can also force the issue.

The new framework relies heavily on the contribution of the credit rating agencies whose reputation would be at stake if they palm off erroneous or questionable opinions

Though dispensations were available to stagger MTM depreciation and to provide for the enhanced gratuity, dividend paying banks were seen to provide for them as of march quarter so as to comply with Sec 15 of the banking Regulations Act, 1949.


UPDATE ON BANKING AND INSURANCE –May 2018

 

Banks are required to review their bond portfolio every quarter. If the value of securities is lower than the market price, banks will have to provide for depreciation. Bond valuation is actually the determination of its fair value. The theoretical fair value is arrived at by discounting the cash flows emanating from the bonds till their maturity, to their present value. The appropriate discount factor is largely determined by similar instruments in the market. Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions.

FIMMDA( Fixed Income Money Market and Derivatives association) was got up by an association of banks, Public Financial Institutions, Insurance Companies and Primary Dealers. FIMMDA ceased to publish price/yield data of government securities from 31 March 2018.

Financial Benchmark India Private Limited(FBIL) has now been entrusted with the task of valuation of Government Securities and State Development Loans . FBIL would also compute and disseminate the daily reference rates for US Dollar and other major currencies against the rupee , a job which was till recently handled by RBI.

FBIL, for the present would adopt the same methodology as was done by FIMMDA for valuations but is expected in due course to develop its own technology and methodology.

FIMMDA had lowered the price valuation of government bonds in December and for that quarter it was estimated that banks had to provide about Rs 15500 cr towards depreciation on these investments. The situation is similar for the March quarter and the Regulator ,in an effort to address the systemic impact of sharp increase in the yields, has given the option to banks to spread the provisioning losses of December and March quarter, by spreading them over four quarters, commencing with the quarter in which the loss is incurred.

Such of those banks which opt for spreading over the depreciation, are expected to make suitable disclosures in their notes to accounts/ quarterly results providing details of
(a) the provisions for depreciation of the investment portfolio for the quarters ended December 2017 and March 2018 made during the quarter/year and
(b) the balance required to be made in the remaining quarters.

With a view to enable the banks to build up adequate reserves to protect themselves against increase in yields in future, the Regulator has advised them to create an Investment Fluctuation Reserve (IFR) with effect from the year 2018-19, as under:
An amount not less than the lower of the following:
(a) net profit on sale of investments during the year
(b) net profit for the year less mandatory appropriations,

which shall be held under Investment Fluctuation Reserve(IFR) until it reaches a cap of at least 2 percent of the Held For Trading( HFT) and Available For Sale ( AFS) portfolio, on a continuing basis. A timeline of 3 years has been suggested for the same.

Regulator may allow drawdown from IFR if it is in excess of 2 percent of its HFT and AFS portfolio, for credit to the balance of profit/loss as disclosed in the profit and loss account at the end of any accounting year and in case the balance in the IFR is less than 2 percent of the HFT and AFS investment portfolio, a draw down may be permitted subject to the following conditions:

(a) The drawn down amount is used only for meeting the minimum CET1/Tier 1 capital requirements by way of appropriation to free reserves or reducing the balance of loss, and
(b) The amount drawn down is not more than the extent the MTM provisions made during the aforesaid year exceed the net profit on sale of investments during that year. Regulator intends considering IFR to be eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 capital. On accounts referred to NCLT under the IBC, banks are expected to provide 40% by March and the balance 10% originally envisaged, to be provided by the June quarter.

----- P S Narasimhan(jandsca@gmail.com)


 

UPDATE ON BANKING AND INSURANCE –April 2018

 

The implementation and refund delays under the new tax regime of GST seem to have led to working capital constraints especially in the case of exporters. Under GST ,exporters are required to pay up first and claim refunds. Delayed refunds had a substantial impact on their working capital needs. A study made by the regulator revealed this aspect which probably was the reason for the circular dated 7th February by the regulator wherein the 90 day prudential norm was extended to 180 days.

As a sequel to the LOU scam, the Regulator has asked banks not to extend Letters of Undertaking/Letters of comfort for trade credits for imports into India. Letters of Credit and guarantees for trade Credit for imports into India would however continue.

Banks have been asked to furnish details of LOUs issued by them in the recent years. Additional details sought include amount outstanding, margin held and information as to whether they fall under the pre-approved credit limits.

Banks have also been asked to complete the linking of SWIFT inter bank messaging system to Core Banking Solutions by April 30 this year. In recent times, frauds have been linked mainly to trade credit with forex transactions involving advance remittances being the preferred route Passport details of borrowers taking loans of Rs 50 cr and more have been made compulsory to ensure that economic offenders do not flee the country that easily. Cabinet has also approved Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill which aims to impound and sell assets of such of those economic offenders to quickly recover their dues and would apply to defaulters who have an outstanding of Rs 100 cr and more. The Regulator has asked the banks to flag loans of Rs 250 cr and more where loan covenants have not been complied with.

Of the twelve major cases referred to NCLT, Resolution Plans for two are almost complete and six are said to be in final stages. In the case of the balance four, proceedings are yet to gain momentum.

THE Finance Ministry has written to State-run banks to take Board approvals for publication of photographs of defaulters in an effort to” name and shame” willful defaulters.

On the Insurance front , Delhi High Court came up with an interesting verdict wherein it came down heavily on the health insurer’s practice of disallowing coverage of genetic disorders. The Court ruled against general exclusion based on the broad label of genetic disorders. IRDA is yet to define what it means by genetic disorders. The judgment finds the term too imprecise and goes onto say that “….the broad exclusion of genetic disorders from Insurance Contracts/claims is illegal and unconstitutional “. The judgment further argues that Insurance Contracts “ have to be based on empirical testing and data and cannot be simply on the basis of subjective or vague factors “.


 

UPDATE ON BANKING AND INSURANCE –March 2018

 

RBI announced a relief for MSME borrowers from the 90 day delinquency norms to 180 days under certain conditions. These borrowers should be registered under GST and should have been standard assets as of 31st August 2017.Amounts overdue as on 1st September 2017 and all those falling due between 1st September 2017 and 31st January 2018 will be extended a 180 day time period under IRAC norms before their performing status is downgraded. The benefit has been extended only on Asset Classification and Income Recognition would be only on realization of interest debited.

The wordings of the circular seems to cover only term loans (“repayment obligations”) and operative accounts like Cash Credit and Overdraft seem to be left out in the limbo. But since the benefit is being given due to adverse impact on the cash flows, it only stands to reason that the benefit of asset classification is available to these facilities too.

The very next day after the issue of the circular relating to MSMEs, RBI came out with a surprise circular on big ticket loans. It did away with Resolution Plans(RP) like Corporate Debt Restructuring, Strategic Debt Restructuring, Scheme for Sustainable Structuring of Stressed Assets etc.,. Here after, the RPs should be approved by all the banks and could include regularization of accounts, restructure etc.,. secondly, a rating agency should give it an investment grade if the loan is above Rs.100 cr(if the loan is above Rs 500 cr, two such agencies should approve); on restructuring the loan would become NPA and for it to become standard, the borrower should show satisfactory performance during the specified period and should have also paid up 20% of the amount so restructured. Loans of Rs 2000 cr and above, currently under implementation under SDR/CDR/S4A schemes will have to be resolved within a time frame of 6 months or go to the bankruptcy courts.

Banks will have to report defaults in excess of Rs 5 cr on a weekly basis to the centralized data base of the Reserve bank of India.

The Regulator has also identified certain signs of stress and a non-exhaustive listing covering them has been spelt out. The list includes non-maintenance of stipulated margins, delay in meeting commitments, excessive leverage, failure to meet statutory obligations, delays in project implementation, elongation of working capital cycle, fall in ratings, inability to meet financial covenants etc.,.

In the short run, slippages are likely to mount, provisioning requirement would go up and top line is likely to remain muted. In the long run, banking system is expected to become stronger. The new norms are expected to spur both the borrower and the lender in to action within 30 days of default so that problems do not get deferred.

------P S Narasimhan (jandsca@gmail.com)

 


 

Professional Updates- January 2018

 

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision , released in August a consultative document on the implications of use of technology in the financial sector and the impact it would have on the supervisory system.

They examined the industry based on three broad scenarios namely focus on technology developments (big data, distributed ledger technology, and cloud computing) and considered three business models (innovative payment services, lending platforms and neo-banks).

The reach of technology has been so significant that emergence of new business models pose an increasing challenge to incumbent banks in almost all the scenarios considered.

Regulators are aware that Banking standards and supervisory expectations should be adaptive to new innovations, while maintaining appropriate prudential standards. Against this background, the Basel Committee has identified 10 key observations and related recommendations on the following supervisory issues for consideration by banks and bank supervisors:



The Government of India which was talking of recapitalizing the public sector banks through budget allocation or through bond issues by way of possible “bail outs”, has come out with a draft Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance Bill 2017 which talks of “bail ins” for the first time.

The measures under ‘bail ins’ would include converting an existing liability into a security ( for example a bank deposit into a preference share), cancellation of a liability etc.,. Sovereign guarantee seems to be no longer considered.

Though the idea is to seek merger of bigger PSBs with smaller PSBs, aspects covering deposits have sent a chill down the spine. The Finance Minister has played down the whole thing saying that it was to elicit the views of the public and to examine various options before the government , to strengthen the banking system. Depositors who are not stakeholders protest that they should not be made part of the bail in and rightly so. If anything the deposit insurance cover threshold should be expanded . With the government keen on increasing banking foot prints, introduction of such a bill is sure to work the other way. However, In a tweet the Finance Minister said ”The objective of the government is to fully protect the interests of the financial institutions and depositors “. The Bill stands as of now, deferred till the budget session.

----------------------P S Narasimhan (jandsca@gmail.com)

 


 

Professional Updates- December 2017



A study Group constituted by the Reserve Bank of India went into the various aspects of Marginal Cost of Funds based Lending Rate(MCLR) and to explore the possibilities of locating a market related bench mark which can be identified with the bank lending rate.

The Group noted that there has been inordinate delay both under the Base Rate regime and MCLR for them to get reflected in the ultimate lending rate, that is delay in the process of transmission. Interestingly, the transmission seemed asymmetric-it was higher during the tightening phase of the monetary cycle and lower during the easing phase. This was true of both the Base Rate and MCLR.

It was noted the banks had deviated in ad hoc manner from the methodologies prescribed for calculating the BR and MCLR , with the intention of maintaining the Base Rate and to prevent it from falling keeping in line with the drop in cost of funds.

The methodologies adopted included a) inappropriate calculation of cost of funds ;b) not changing the BR even on the face of sharp decline in the cost of funds; c)reporting sharp increase in the return on the networth not in line with either the past records or future prospects; and d) inserting new components in to the formula so as to arrive at the desired level. The long reset periods added to the lag in further slowing down the transmission.

The Group noted monetary transmission to be impeded by 4 factors- i)General deterioration in the health of the banking sector; ii)while fixed rates ruled the deposits, floating rates prevailed on advances. (It was noted that fixed deposits of one year and above tenor constituted more than 53% of the deposits); iii)interest rate stayed rigid covering Savings bank deposits.; and iv)other financial saving instruments were seen as a threat by banks who feared loss of deposits if there was a drop in the deposit rate. Thus the Liability side became rather rigid. Added to these factors, increasing stressed assets meant that banks had to maintain the Net Interest Margin so as to provide for loan losses and could not afford to bring NIM down. This meant a higher pricing of advances.

While it took nearly 6 months transmission of change in MCLR to get reflected in the Lending rate in the case of Private sector banks, it took even longer in the case of PSBs. There was large scale arbitrariness to the whole aspect. Banks added an arbitrary Business Risk Premium, backed by little or no documentation, to hold their lending rate high.

The Group recommended the following-
- calculation of Base Rate should not be compromised at any cost
- a sunset clause is a must for migration and
- there should be large scale dissemination of the information on how the rate was arrived at.
In a bid to identify a market rate which can function as the bench mark ,the Group overlooking 13 different rates in the market, zeroed in on three rates- the T Bill rate, C D Rate and Reserve bank’s Policy Repo Rate, as more suitable.

The Group also recommended that once the spread is fixed, it should be maintained during the entire term of a loan and secondly, reset clause can come in to play quarter wise and not annually as is being done now.

-P S Narasimhan ( jandsca@gmail.com)


Professional Updates- November 2017

Banking and Insurance

From October 14, 2017, every commercial bank, is expected to maintain in India, assets (referred to as ‘SLR assets’ ) the value of which shall not, at the close of business on any day, be less than 19.5 per cent of their total net demand and time liabilities in India as on the last Friday of the second preceding fortnight. The valuation basis shall be in accordance with the method of valuation specified by the Reserve Bank of India.

This percentage is a reduction from the earlier SLR requirement of banks of 20.0 per cent of their Net Demand and Time Liabilities (NDTL).

In the words of the Regulator ,“Currently, the banks are permitted to exceed the limit of 25 per cent of the total investments under HTM category, provided the excess comprises of SLR securities and total SLR securities held under HTM category are not more than 20.5 per cent of NDTL. In order to align this ceiling on the SLR holdings under HTM category with the mandatory SLR, it has been decided to reduce the ceiling from 20.5 per cent to 19.5 per cent in a phased manner, i.e. 20 per cent by December 31, 2017 and 19.5 per cent by March 31, 2018.”

As of now, banks can shift investments to/from HTM with the approval of the Board of Directors once a year, and such shifting will normally be allowed at the beginning of the accounting year. In order to enable banks to shift their excess SLR securities from the HTM category to AFS/HFT to comply with the Regulator’s instructions , RBI has decided to allow such shifting of the excess securities and direct sale from HTM category. RBI says, ”This would be in addition to the shifting permitted at the beginning of the accounting year, i.e., in the month of April. Such transfer to AFS/HFT category as well as sale of securities from HTM category, to the extent required to reduce the SLR securities in HTM category in accordance with the regulatory instructions, would be excluded from the 5 per cent cap prescribed for value of sales and transfers of securities to/from HTM category under paragraph 2.3 (ii) of the Master Circular on Prudential Norms for Classification, Valuation and Operation of Investment Portfolio by Banks”.

The Regulator recently issued a Master Direction on Financial Services provided by Banks. Here after no bank can hold more than 10 per cent in the equity of a deposit taking NBFC (except that of a housing finance company).Banks cannot make an investment of more than 10 per cent of the unit capital of a Real Estate Investment Trust/Infrastructure Investment Trust subject to overall ceiling of 20 per cent of its net worth permitted for direct investments in shares, convertible bonds/debentures, units of equity-oriented mutual funds and exposures to Alternative Investment Funds. Also no bank can hereafter hold more than the lower of 10% of its own paid up capital and reserves or 10 per cent of the paid up capital of a company, not being its subsidiary engaged in non-financial services , provided investments in excess of 10 per cent but not exceeding 30 per cent of the paid up share capital of such investee company may be permitted under select circumstances.

Insurance Companies are offering special insurance cover to meet medical expenses incurred in tackling the dreaded dengue disease

---------P.S.Narasimhan (jandsca@gmail.com)


Professional Updates- September 2017


Banking and Insurance

One of the measures contemplated to counter the menace of mounting NPAs is the setting up of a Public Credit Registry. A suggestion to this effect has come from Dr Viral.V.Acharya, Deputy Governor ,RBI. A Public Credit Registry (PCR) is an extensive database of credit information that would be accessible to all stakeholders and managed by a public authority like the central bank. The idea is to capture all relevant information in one large database on the borrower. At present, several Indian banks burdened with NPAs are looking for a service provider who can give them objective data for making credit decisions and enable them to defend their actions with market evidence when subjected to scrutiny

A PCR, is expected to help in a) Credit assessment and pricing by banks; b) Risk-based, dynamic and countercyclical provisioning at banks; c) Supervision and early intervention by regulators; d) assist in effective transmission of monetary policy; and, e) help in strategic restructuring of stressed bank credits...

A central repository would capture details of collaterals and can prevent over-pledging of collateral by a borrower. In absence of such information, the lender charges a high cost on the loan or asks for more collateral than necessary to prevent being diluted by other lenders. Also, in the absence of a PCR, the ‘good’ borrowers are disadvantaged in not being to demonstrate their credit worthiness..

Currently, the private Credit Bureaus (CBs) operating in India are regulated by RBI and each one of them focuses on data analytics to provide credit scores, and allied reports and services. These analytics are useful for the member banks for issuing credit cards as well as for taking decisions (primarily on retail loans) as of now.

RBI’s CRILC set up in 2014-15, is now one of the most important databases for offsite supervision, Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs) report credit information of their large borrowers, i.e., those having aggregate fund-based and non-fund based exposure of INR 50 million and above. It covers around sixty per cent of the loan portfolio and around eighty per cent of the non-performing loans of SCBs. It captures only limited details which are shared with the reporting banks but is not open to the Credit Bureaus, larger lender community, or researchers .Also, they are not available in real time to take credit decisions at the micro level and do not capture fully the credit data .. .

Small and marginal aspirants, are disadvantaged against large borrowers as they lack many of the desired qualifications for credit. Transparency of credit information would serve as a “reputational collateral” for such borrowers. Even transactional data of potential borrowers including payments to utilities like power and telecom would help the small players. Regularity in making payments to utilities and trade creditors provides an indication of the credit quality.. In turn, credit from the formal sector can flow to them, boosting financial inclusion. As a side benefit, the extent of financial inclusion will likely become more precisely measurable for policy makers..

PCRs can help in enhancing efficiency of the credit market, increase financial inclusion, improve ease of doing business, and help control delinquencies. Incorporating unique linkages (Aadhar for individuals and CIN for companies), Reserve Bank’s datasets can quickly be converted into a useful PCR covering customers of SCBs to start with. It can then be expanded to cover other financial institutions in India. A comprehensive PCR down the road will be even more effective. It’s time India goes to make the establishment of a PCR a reality !

---------P.S.Narasimhan (jandsca@gmail.com)


Professional Updates- August 2017


Banking and Insurance

The Regulator has come out with guidelines for Small Finance banks(SFBs). These banks are intended to serve the unserved and underserved sections of the population. They would extend credit to small business units, small and marginal farmers, micro and small industries and to the organized sector. These banks in the private sector are expected to be high on technology and low on operational costs. SFBs would have 25% of their branches in unbanked rural centres.

These banks are expected to lend 75% of their Adjusted Net Bank Credit to Priority Sector. Of this 75%, 18% would be to agriculture( within which 8% would be to the benefit of Small and Marginal Farmers), 7.5% to Micro Enterprises and 10% to weaker sections of the society.

Credit to Agriculture would cover Farm Credit- which would include lending of long, medium and short term loans for cultivation, for agriculture infrastructure and for ancillary activities. Farm Credit would include allied activities such as dairy, fishery, animal husbandry, poultry, sericulture etc.,. Purchase of agricultural machinery and implements, spraying, weeding, transportation etc. would also get covered under this farm credit. Borrowers could also include corporates up to an aggregate limit of Rs 2 cr.

Agriculture infrastructure would include market yards, warehouses, godowns and silos., soil conservation and watershed development, tissue culture and aspects like agri bio-technology, seed production, bio-pesticides etc.,. Corporates can be borrowers too with the upper limit going up to Rs 100 cr.

Ancillary activities would cover agri-clinics, agro-business centres, food-agro processing, maintenance of fleet of tractors, bulldozers, well-boring equipment, threshers, combines etc.,.

Marginal farmers are those with holdings of less than 1 hectare and small farmers would be those who have 1 to 2 hectares. Similarly limits have been prescribed to identify Micro, Small and medium enterprises as well. Services sector are identified with reference to the cost of equipment they hold. These banks will also cover sectors like housing, renewable energy, education and social infra for their lending..Rate of Interest charged will be as per DBR Master Directions.

It is learnt that the government is keen on coming out with a simpler bankruptcy code to cover defaulters in the non-corporate world which would include small and medium enterprises managed by partnership firms and proprietary units. Since these organizations have unlimited liability, people involved have no protection for their personal assets.. Once a unit is into the Bankruptcy code the stake sale would fall short of the market value. Such issues will have to be addressed before the code is put in place. The Code is expected to cover personal bankruptcy of individuals who hold business interests.

Of course, the problem of chronic NPAs will not get solved in a jiffy but the process is on.

---------P.S.Narasimhan (jandsca@gmail.com)


Professional Updates- July 2017

Banking and Insurance

The stressed asset pile in the Indian banking System is estimated to be around Rs 10 trillion.Of this, assets labeled Non Performing, account for about Rs 7.7 trillion and the balance ,held under restructured category. RBI’s internal panel had identified accounts with outstandings in excess of Rs 5000 cr ( 60% of which was already classified as Non Performing) for bankruptcy proceedings. In May this year, through an Ordinance amending Banking Regulation Act, RBI has been empowered to ask banks to initiate proceedings against defaulters.

The Internal Advisory Committee of the Regulator,( which has independent board members of the Central Bank as its members) identified accounts to be referred to.. The panel seems to have sieved through top 500 stressed accounts for being referred for resolution under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016(IBC).

RBI has for a start ,zeroed on 12 accounts representing about 25% of gross NPAs in the banking system and these accounts would be referred for bankruptcy proceedings.

It appears that National Company Law Tribunal(NCLT) which is the arbitration authority under the Bankruptcy Law would take up these cases on priority. Banks have been asked to file for insolvency proceedings under IBC with NCLT. NCLT already handles 81 cases of NPAs. Creditors seem to have initiated Insolvency proceedings in 18 cases.

For those accounts which do not immediately meet the criteria for reference, the advisory panel has suggested the concerned banks to come up with a resolution plan within six months. Where no viable plan emerge, such cases too are likely to be taken up under IBC.

The relevant press release reads as follows:
“As regards the other non-performing accounts which do not qualify under the above criteria, the IAC recommended that banks should finalise a resolution plan within six months. In cases where a viable resolution plan is not agreed upon within six months, banks should be required to file for insolvency proceedings under the IBC.

The Reserve Bank, based on the recommendations of the IAC, will accordingly be issuing directions to banks to file for insolvency proceedings under the IBC in respect of the identified accounts. Such cases will be accorded priority by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

The details of the resolution framework in regard to the other non-performing accounts will be released in the coming days.

The circular on revised provisioning norms for cases accepted for resolution under the IBC is being issued separately.”

On the provisioning front, on such of these accounts which have suffered no loan loss provisioning so far, bankers seem to prefer to spread them over a few quarters so that the impact is softened on the financials.

---------P.S.Narasimhan (jandsca@gmail.com)


Professional Updates- June 2017

Banking and Insurance

In a recent Circular the Regulator stressed the need for the participants of a Joint Lenders Forum to conform to the timelines set under a Corrective Action Plan( CAP). In its circular dated 5th May, the Regulator has this to say:

“In order to ensure that the CAP is finalised and formulated in an expeditious manner, the Framework specifies various timelines within which lenders have to decide and implement the CAP. The Framework also contains disincentives, in the form of asset classification and accelerated provisioning where lenders fail to adhere to the provisions of the Framework. Despite this, delays have been observed in finalising and implementation of the CAP, leading to delays in resolution of stressed assets in the banking system.

It is hereby clarified that the CAP can also include resolution by way of Flexible Structuring of Project Loans, Change in Ownership under Strategic Debt Restructuring, Scheme for Sustainable Structuring of Stressed Assets (S4A), etc.

In this context, it is reiterated that lenders must scrupulously adhere to the timelines prescribed in the Framework for finalising and implementing the CAP. To facilitate timely decision making, it has been decided that, henceforth, the decisions agreed upon by a minimum of 60 percent of creditors by value and 50 percent of creditors by number in the JLF would be considered as the basis for deciding the CAP, and will be binding on all lenders, subject to the exit (by substitution) option available in the Framework. Lenders shall ensure that their representatives in the JLF are equipped with appropriate mandates, and that decisions taken at the JLF are implemented by the lenders within the timelines.

. It shall be noted that

  • (i) the stand of the participating banks while voting on the final proposal before the JLF shall be unambiguous and unconditional;
  • (ii) any bank which does not support the majority decision on the CAP may exit subject to substitution within the stipulated time line, failing which it shall abide the decision of the JLF;
  • (iii) the bank shall implement the JLF decision without any additional conditionalities; and
  • (iv) the Boards shall empower their executives to implement the JLF decision without requiring further approval from the Board.

Any non-adherence to these instructions and timelines specified under the Framework shall attract monetary penalties on the concerned banks under the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act 1949”

The urgency that comes out is very palpable.
Global Financial Stability Report of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) points out two important points: that Indian industrial sector is now among the most heavily indebted in the world in terms of the ability of its cash flows to meet its bank loan repayments; and, -secondly, Indian banking sector has set aside very little bank capital to cover provision for loan losses on loans made essentially to the industrial sector.

Dr Viral V.Acharya, Deputy Governor suggests a five-pronged remedy which include Private capital raising, Asset sale including disposal of non- core assets and healthy loan portfolios, Mergers, Divestment by Government increasing direct public participation, and tough corrective action.

---------P.S.Narasimhan (jandsca@gmail.com)


Professional Updates- May 2017

Banking and Insurance

UPDATES ON THE BANKING FRONT- MAY 2017

Central Government is in the process of setting up a Information Utility(IU) known as Credit Registry which would provide data on borrowing, default, security cover available on the lending and borrowing transactions extended by banks and financial institutions ,on advances which have ended up as stressed assets. Authorised users would be able to know the current status of such borrowers.

The Regulator is concerned that some of the Overseas Direct Investments under FDI schemes are posing major problems like round tripping, tax evasion, money laundering etc.. RBI is exploring ways and means to curb this menace.

March 17th was fixed as the date for share swap with regard to the merger of the 5 associates with State bank of India which came into effect on the first of April. The Minority shareholders who got identified on this day (Mar17) in the case of SBBJ, SBM, and SBT, are entitled to receive Equity Shares in SBI of Face Value of Re 1 each at the agreed swap ratio.

Credit growth has fallen below 5 % belying the expectations of quicker recovery in factory output. The data put out by the Regulator showed that bank loans grew by 4.88% year-on-year compared to 11.2 % , a year ago. This is by far the slowest fortnightly growth since 2006. Low consumer spending which has led to lower capacity utilization is said to be the main cause for the lackadaisical credit growth.

All Savings Bank accounts may soon become internet-enabled. Increased digital banking is expected to make more and more account holders to turn to operating their accounts through the net. . Internet users are expected to cross 450 to 465 million by June this year from 432 million last December. Of these 432 million, 269 million were in urban areas.

Credit Information Company TransUnion CIBIL has come out with a credit risk ranking for MSME units. The exposure of the banking industry to this sector is around Rs 12 lakh crore. Using the algorithms based on the credit history data, the CIBIL MSME Rank(CMR) is expected to forecast default probability in the next 12 months.

S&P Global Ratings opined that the profitability of banks in India would improve next fiscal but warned that unless large scale capital infusion is made, the banks would continue to be vulnerable. Banks in a bid to keep in line with the emerging financial ecosystem , are looking to adopt different pattern of financing – aggregation financing, supply-chain financing, Internet based financing are seen as the latest corporate trends in this regard.

The players in the virtual currency market like Zebpay,Unocoin, Coinsecure and Searchtrade have constituted Digital Asset and Blockchain Foundation of India( Dabfi) which is expected to provide an orderly and transparent growth of the virtual currency market. This body is expected to function as a self-regulatory Organisation(SRO). An International law firm has been entrusted with the task of framing self-regulation norms.

In the meanwhile, Deputy Governor of RBI, raised concerns over virtual currencies since according to the Regulator, they pose potential financial, legal, customer protection and securityrelated risks.
------P.S.Narasimhan(jandsca@gmail.com)


Professional Updates- April 2017

Banking and Insurance

Central Government is in the process of setting up a Information Utility(IU) known as Credit Registry which would provide data on borrowing, default, security cover available on the lending and borrowing transactions extended by banks and financial institutions ,on advances which have ended up as stressed assets. Authorised users would be able to know the current status of such borrowers.

The Regulator is concerned that some of the Overseas Direct Investments under FDI schemes are posing major problems like round tripping, tax evasion, money laundering etc.. RBI is exploring ways and means to curb this menace.

March 17th has been fixed as the date for share swap with regard to the merger of the 5 associates with State bank of India which is expected to come into effect on the first of April. The Minority shareholders would get identified on this day (Mar17) in the case of SBBJ, SBM, and SBT, who would be entitled to receive Equity Shares in SBI of Face Value of Re 1 each at the agreed swap ratio.

World bank’s Chief Executive, Kristalina Georgieva batted for ban of high-value bank notes saying that the move would have a profound and positive impact on the economy.. OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria said that ban of high value notes would help the nation to move towards a less-cash society and will add greater financial penetration and would lead to better consumer protection.

Credit growth has fallen below 5 % belying the expectations of quicker recovery in factory output. The data put out by the Regulator showed that bank loans grew by 4.88% year-on-year compared to 11.2 % , a year ago. This is by far the slowest fortnightly growth since 2006. Low consumer spending which has led to lower capacity utilization is said to be the main cause for the lackadaisical credit growth.

All Savings Bank accounts may soon become internet-enabled. Increased digital banking is expected to make more and more account holders to turn to operating their accounts through the net. . Internet users are expected to cross 450 to 465 million by June this year from 432 million last December. Of these 432 million, 269 million were in urban areas.

Banks in a bid to keep in line with the emerging financial eco-system , are looking to adopt different pattern of financing – aggregation financing, supply-chain financing, Internet based financing are seen as the latest corporate trends in this regard.

Credit Information Company TransUnion CIBIL has come out with a credit risk ranking for MSME units. The exposure of the banking industry to this sector is around Rs 12 lakh crore. Using the algorithms based on the credit history data, the CIBIL MSME Rank(CMR) is expected to forecast default probability in the next 12 months.

S&P Global Ratings opined that the profitability of banks in India would improve next fiscal but warned that unless large scale capital infusion is made, the banks would continue to be vulnerable

The players in the virtual currency market like Zebpay,Unocoin, Coinsecure and Searchtrade have constituted Digital Asset and Blockchain Foundation of India( Dabfi) which is expected to provide an orderly and transparent growth of the virtual currency market. This body is expected to function as a self-regulatory Organisation(SRO). An International law firm has been entrusted with the task of framing self-regulation norms.

In the meanwhile, Deputy Governor of RBI, raised concerns over virtual currencies since according to the Regulator, they pose potential financial, legal, customer protection and security-related risks.

RBI has given its preliminary views on the demonetization and opines its impact on the real economy, to be transient. The banking sector benefited thro’ increase in CASA (which surged by 4.1%). The increase in Net Interest Income is expected to absorb the cost of managing the process of currency exchange. The impact of demonetization in certain segments like exports especially of readymade garments, gems and jewellery was said to be significant.

On the ways and means to decisively resolve the problem of stressed assets, Sri.Viral.v.Acharya Deputy Governor, RBI suggests two models-one through Private Asset Management Companies and two, National asset Management Companies. He is however clear that these entities should be engaged only in resolving the stressed asset problems and not get in to regular banking. In his words ,” It would be better to limit the objective of these asset management companies to orderly resolution of stressed assets with graceful exit thereafter; in other words, no mission creep over time to do anything else such as raise deposits, start a new lending portfolio, or help deliver social programs. It is essential to keep the business model of these entities simple to make them attractive for private investors with expertise for the main task on hand – asset restructuring.”


Professional Updates- March 2017

Banking and Insurance

Can banks effect payments out of Statutory Reserves without the Regulator’s nod? Normally, it is never done but now in the case of such of those banks trying to meet the Coupons issued by them towards Perpetual Debt Instruments (meant for the purpose of mobilizing Additional Tier I capital under Basel III), RBI has come out with certain clarifications. The banks which plan issue of such PDIs should ensure first and also specifically spell out that that they have full discretion at all times to cancel distributions / payments, for them to be eligible to make such an issue.

Secondly, before effecting payments towards such coupons out of reserves, banks have to ensure that they meet the minimum regulatory requirements for CET1, Tier 1 and Total Capital ratios including the additional capital requirements for Domestic Systemically Important Banks at all times, subject to the restrictions under the capital buffer frameworks

Thirdly, banks should, out of current year’s profits, profits brought forward and revenue reserves (excluding reserves such as Statutory Reserves, Share Premium, revaluation reserve, foreign currency translation reserve, and Investment Reserve) net off losses and Deferred Revenue Expenditure if any and if the resultant balance is inadequate to meet the bond payments, then they can use the Statutory Reserve. In such a case, the banks need not seek prior permission from the regulator but should however keep the regulator informed after meeting the obligations within the time span specified.

On the aspect of its continued concern for cyber security, the Regulator intends constituting a Standing Committee, which will be cross functional, and would include industry experts as well as the government representatives.

Regarding the asset quality that exists in the banking system, the Regulator is of the opinion, based on the results received from banks on Q3 and on the basis of provisional data available, while there appears some elevation in gross NPA ratio in the banking system across the categories, for the first time in few quarters this time it is seen that in few banks the ratio has come down vis-à-vis the preceding quarter. Similarly, there is also a dip in respect of net NPA ratio, indicating that the level of provisioning to be quite adequate. There also appears to be a reduction in the percentage of restructured assets as well. Overall, the system reflects some improvement in operating profit but provisioning pressures on net profit are likely to continue. One should also keep in mind the beneficial circular issued on asset classification and income recognition which was necessitated due to re-monetization of certain specified currencies, while evaluating the asset quality of this quarter. On capital adequacy, while most of the banks are well-placed to meet the regulatory norms, going forward quite a few banks would be required to raise additional capital to meet the requirements, opines the regulator. Banks would require Rs 91000 cry by March 2019 by way of additional capital funds even assuming an average growth of 8 to 9%...Of this additional tier I capital would be Rs 50000 cr. According to Sri Vend Ray, Chief of BBB, Rs 10000 cry earmarked for 2017-18 towards capitalization would be adequate supplemented with Rights Issue where considered necessary for the time being. Banks led by SBI have sought a longer term for amortizing loan losses- that is over several quarters- which may arise due to deep restructuring of loans.

Professional forecasters on Macro Economic Indicators felt that bank credit is likely to grow by 11.9% in 2017-18. Consumer Confidence Survey indicated a lower level of optimism for a period covering one year forward considering economic conditions, income, spending, employment and price level.

Government of India intends pumping in Rs 500 cry in to India Post Payments Bank so that 650 branches get set up by September 2017. Of this, Rs.123 cry would be by way of capital infusion and Rs 375 cry would be through grants-in-aid.

The much awaited merger of Subsidiaries with SBI has been deferred to a date post-March.
Banks registered a sharp decline in FCNR-B deposits in the quarter ending December 2016- from USD 44.11 billion USD in September to 20.85 billion USD by December.

Banks have been asked by RBI to create a pool of forensic audit firms in view of the growing advance related frauds. Such frauds, it is said, constituted 92% of total frauds in 2016.